The order, made available Saturday, said that the petitioner alleged that the demolition was “reprisal” for a newspaper report which contained ... of the right to property under Article 300A would be ...
ABP Live on MSN4d
'Bulldozer Justice Simply Unacceptable': CJI Chandrachud's Parting Blow To Yogi Govt's 'Bulldozer Action'In the final written verdict, the Supreme Court has said that citizens’ voices cannot be throttled by a threat of destroying ...
Akash alleged that the demolition was reprisal for “a newspaper report which contained ... of the right to property under Article 300A would be reduced to a dead letter”.
If it were to be permitted the constitutional recognition of the right to property under Article 300A would be reduced to a ...
What’s more, the Bench then directs in para 34 stating that, “The Registrar (Judicial) shall circulate a copy of this judgment to the Chief Secretaries of all the States/Union Territories to ensure ...
The apex court judgment in the UP bulldozer case lays down the law to be followed by all governments, says Sanjeev Sirohi ...
Here is what CJI DY Chandrachud observed against bulldozer action on Manoj Tibrewal Aakash’ petition
The verdict was pronounced by the Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud-led three-judge bench on the petition of senior ...
The Supreme Court pronounced a landmark verdict in the case of illegal demolition of house by bulldozers in Uttar Pradesh.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback